An exchange of retorts and jokes occurs during an Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) hearing as Jeremy Greenwood faces accusations related to evidence in connection with Anita Perrottet’s work. The reports describe comments that include references to “manufacturing evidence” and characterize aspects of the work as “bogus,” alongside humour and rebuttals in court.
Both outlets frame the moment as part of the hearing’s broader disputing, with Greenwood responding to claims made about the basis and handling of evidence. The coverage emphasizes the unusual tone—rebukes and back-and-forth remarks—while still centring on the underlying allegation that evidence has been manufactured or improperly handled. Across the two sources, the same core events and wording are highlighted, but neither outlet provides additional independent detail in the excerpts provided.
Overall, the common focus is the hearing context and the dispute over evidence connected to the work attributed to Perrottet, with the light-hearted remarks and sharp replies illustrating how the parties conduct themselves during an adversarial proceeding.
