Multiple reviewers assess the performance “Triptych,” describing its visuals as a standout. Across outlets, critics highlight the work’s “stunning lighting” and “beautiful shapes,” noting the visual design and presentation as major strengths.
However, all three sources converge on a central criticism: the choreography does not develop as strongly as the staging. Reviewers say the movement composition is lacking in “choreographic depth,” which they describe as undermining the overall impact despite the production’s aesthetic qualities.
The common thread across Brisbane Times, Sydney Morning Herald, and The Age is a contrast between form and substance—strong lighting and shaping of bodies in space versus a perceived shortfall in how the choreography builds, evolves, or sustains interest. While the articles frame their judgments as part of a broader “what’s hot and what’s not” section, they consistently align on both the praised elements and the main critique.
