US banking groups say they are still dissatisfied with the wording of the Senate’s proposed CLARITY Act for stablecoins, particularly provisions related to stablecoin yield. In a joint statement, the American Bankers Association and several other banking organizations acknowledge that Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks are pursuing what they view as the correct policy goal—limiting stablecoin yield in a way that protects bank deposits—but they argue the “proposed language” currently “falls short.” The dispute is tied to Section 404, which bankers say may allow crypto platforms to provide payments-stablecoin users interest or yield in ways that could create a “loophole.” Banking groups have cited studies warning that broad stablecoin adoption could trigger large deposit outflows from the US banking system, potentially affecting community banks. They also point to an argument that deposit-driven credit effects could reduce consumer, small-business, and farm lending. White House economists, however, reported in April that banning stablecoin yield may increase bank lending by about $2.1 billion, a marginal net rise. The bill, which passed the House in July, has faced uncertainty about its timing before the November 2026 midterms. Tillis says the current text is a compromise that would prohibit rewards on idle balances while allowing other customer rewards, and he argues it supports a bipartisan path forward.