An independent draft review into Silicon Valley Bank’s (SVB) 2023 collapse says Federal Reserve supervisory actions were too slow in addressing vulnerabilities that supervisors knew about or should have known about earlier. Bloomberg reports the findings come from a draft report commissioned by Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who has argued for an outside review. The review is described as identifying supervisory shortcomings ahead of SVB’s failure.
Context around SVB’s downfall is consistent across outlets. SVB collapses in March 2023 after a fast deposit run exposes weaknesses in its balance sheet. The bank held large unrealized losses on longer-term securities as interest rates rose and had a deposit base that was highly concentrated and largely uninsured. After SVB announced a $1.8 billion after-tax loss on March 8, more than $40 billion in deposits left the following day, regulators shut the bank on March 10.
Where the accounts differ is mainly in emphasis. The Economic Times details reasons the review cites for delays, including a culture of risk aversion and unclear decision-making authority, and says the review does not find that social media triggered the run. Both accounts tie the supervisory delay question to subsequent Fed efforts to strengthen oversight, including more direct reporting of unresolved concerns to senior officials.