Earl Spencer’s memoir, which covers aspects of Princess Diana’s life, is released this week and includes claims that some outlets describe as critical of the King. Several reports say Spencer frames his decision to write the book as a matter of duty rather than publicity.

Multiple outlets describe the memoir as a “bombshell” or tell-all, with Spencer presenting allegations in the context of Diana’s story. The Daily Express and Independent report on the motivation behind the writing, while the Evening Standard repeats Spencer’s “duty” rationale and highlights the book’s more contentious allegations.

Coverage also varies in emphasis. The Mirror focuses more on commentary about Spencer’s motives, reporting criticism or questioning that his memoir could be driven by financial or promotional considerations. Overall, outlets agree on the memoir’s publication timing and on Spencer’s portrayal of Diana’s life, but they differ on how they interpret his stated reasons and the significance of the claims within the book.