The Gandhis oppose the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) appeal in the National Herald case, arguing that the challenge amounts to an “abuse of process.” In their response to the ED’s revision petition, they say the matter is not maintainable.
Both reports indicate the Gandhis also defend the existing lower-court ruling. They argue that a December 16, 2025 order by the trial court is “perfectly legal and sound in law.” The outlets frame the issue as a dispute over the procedural validity of the ED’s move rather than a change to the underlying allegations at this stage.
While the sources align on the thrust of the response—opposition to the ED plea and criticism of the revision petition’s maintainability—differences in framing focus on the legal terminology used by the Gandhis (emphasizing “abuse of process”) and the specific characterization of the trial court order as already legally correct.
