Sunny Hostin has said she was the holdout juror in New York’s 1991 cannibal killer murder trial, but other accounts from jurors and contemporaneous reporting dispute that claim. Fox News reports that co-jurors told multiple outlets the holdout was an unemployed man rather than Hostin.

The New York Post cites remarks from a juror, identified as Valerie Holmes, describing the holdout as someone who was unemployed and motivated by the $15 daily pay and meals provided during jury service. The outlet characterizes these accounts as based on reports from the time of the verdict, arguing Hostin’s version does not match what other jurors said.

Across the coverage, the central point of contention is the identity of the lone holdout juror: Hostin’s later statement versus statements attributed to other jurors and described in accounts from 1991. The sources agree the trial involves a cannibalism-related murder case in New York and that the holdout juror role is a key detail in recounting the outcome.