Three Australian outlets report concerns about a surrogacy “baby brokerage” market amid claims that some intermediaries operate with limited oversight. The reports describe a surrogacy industry that has expanded into a large commercial sector and say prospective parents can face difficulty navigating complex arrangements involving multiple parties and contracts. The articles allege that brokers may exert control over processes connected to surrogacy, including by holding embryos, which can leave children’s legal status unclear and families uncertain about outcomes. The pieces characterize the brokerage model as opaque, suggesting consumers may not fully understand who is responsible for different stages of the arrangements or what recourse exists if disputes arise. While the reports use charged language to describe the conduct of alleged brokers, they broadly focus on the same theme: that families may be exposed to risk when companies and intermediaries manage payments and custody-related issues under current regulatory settings. The outlets call attention to the lack of transparency and the need for clearer rules and accountability across the surrogacy supply chain.