Ale Circati scores an equaliser from close range at the back post after a lengthy VAR check, according to multiple outlets. The goal comes late enough in the match to change the scoreline after the initial decision is reviewed.
All three reports describe the incident in similar terms: the match officials take time to review the play using video assistance before allowing or confirming Circati’s strike. While the outlets share the same basic match moment, they do not provide additional detail in their short summaries beyond the fact that the VAR process is prolonged and that Circati is the player who makes the breakthrough.
Across the sources, the focus stays on the key event—the VAR review and the equalising goal—and there are no reported disagreements about who scores, where the goal is scored, or the general outcome of the review. The common emphasis is on the delay created by the review before the equaliser is confirmed.
