A former patient of disgraced neurosurgeon Sam Eljamel says she is “shocked” by how NHS Tayside handles an inquiry. Gillian Davidson, who has spoken publicly about her experience, says the health board “didn’t seem to grasp the seriousness” of the process.
The reports frame her reaction as a response to the board’s approach to investigating the case. While the accounts share the same central point—Davidson’s criticism and surprise about the inquiry—details on what specific actions or decisions by NHS Tayside are in question are limited in the provided extracts. One outlet uses the wording “shock” and describes Davidson’s assessment of the seriousness of the inquiry, while another presents the same story using the same overall framing.
Across sources, the focus is on the former patient’s perspective on the inquiry process rather than on new findings or procedural outcomes. The articles consistently attribute the statements to Davidson and identify NHS Tayside as the body she is challenging.
