The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) opposes a former petroleum minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke’s, request to present evidence of her acquittal by the Southwark Crown Court in London before a Federal High Court in Abuja. EFCC argues that the UK judgment does not relate to the issues the Nigerian court is deciding.
According to multiple reports, EFCC files a counter-affidavit seeking dismissal of the application. It says the foreign proceedings and the alleged acquittal are not material or relevant to the suit before Justice Inyang Ekwo, which concerns the forfeiture and proposed sale of assets connected to Alison-Madueke. One report notes that Justice Ekwo earlier granted a motion to introduce the London judgment on July 1, after her lawyer moved the application, and that EFCC counsel did not oppose at that stage. In the latest filings, EFCC also characterizes parts of Alison-Madueke’s submissions as misleading or improperly introducing irrelevant facts.
Overall, outlets agree on the EFCC’s position and the purpose of the Abuja case, with emphasis varying on procedural history and the court’s handling of the initial motion to admit the UK evidence.