The Supreme Court rules that states can regulate and ban online games that involve betting or wagering, overturning earlier High Court decisions in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. A bench led by Justice J B Pardiwala sets aside judgments from the Madras and Karnataka High Courts that had struck down state laws restricting online rummy and poker when played with stakes. The Supreme Court says the High Courts erred in holding that the state legislations were beyond their authority. The Court also clarifies that even games involving substantial skill can be subject to state regulation if they adversely affect public well-being. It further holds that betting and wagering do not receive constitutional protection even when they are linked to games of skill. The Court’s reasoning emphasizes the need to restore public tranquility. In addition, the Supreme Court states that online gaming operators are not treated only as intermediaries or facilitators; they supply actionable claims, which makes them subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST).