Birmingham residents criticize the city council for installing speed bumps on a road while saying existing potholes have not been fixed. Reporting describes the decision as wasteful, pointing to the placement of the traffic-calming measures adjacent to areas that residents say remain in poor condition. Residents allege that taxpayer funding is being used for temporary or supplementary measures rather than addressing underlying road maintenance problems. The criticism is framed as a concern about priorities and road safety, with residents comparing the council’s actions—adding speed bumps to slow drivers—to the apparent lack of progress on pothole repairs. The account highlights local dissatisfaction and ridicule toward the council’s approach, emphasizing frustration that potholes remain while speed controls are added nearby. The reports do not indicate that the council has fully resolved the road issues or explain the rationale for the placement of the speed bumps. Overall, the story centers on local reactions to what residents describe as an inconsistent response to ongoing road surface defects.