Multiple outlets report that the National Anti-Corruption Commission is facing a growing “identity crisis” and intensified scrutiny over how it operates. The reporting says the concerns build over almost two years, described as developing slowly, at times unexpectedly, and often through closed-door processes rather than open engagement. The articles characterize the commission’s trajectory as creating uncertainty about its role, priorities, and effectiveness in tackling corruption. They also suggest that the commission’s approach has contributed to perceptions that it operates with insufficient transparency. While the coverage focuses on internal and external doubts about the commission’s conduct and public standing, the accounts converge on the theme that secrecy has become a central issue in the public debate. The outlets frame the current moment as a turning point in which the commission’s methods and identity are being questioned more openly than before. The reporting emphasizes that the controversy reflects broader expectations for anti-corruption bodies to be transparent, accountable, and clearly aligned to their mandates.