Defence lawyers for two nurses charged with making antisemitic threats argue that a video relied on by the prosecution may be excluded from court. All three outlets report that the defence’s central submission is that excluding the video would significantly harm the prosecution’s case. The lawyers contend that, if the footage cannot be presented as evidence, it would be a “devastating blow” to how prosecutors intend to prove the allegations. The matter is before the court as part of proceedings in the case, with the dispute focused specifically on whether the recording is admissible. The reports do not indicate a ruling yet or detail the precise legal grounds the defence cites, but they consistently frame the issue as a pivotal evidentiary challenge. The nurses deny the allegations, while the prosecution seeks to rely on the video. The articles therefore centre on an ongoing legal decision about the use of that footage rather than on the merits of the threats themselves.