A judge rules that West Lothian Council acted unlawfully in how it provides toilet facilities for a pupil in a school setting. According to the reports, the ruling relates to the council’s toilet provision and whether it met legal requirements. The judge also finds that the pupil experiences indirect discrimination connected to the toilet arrangements. However, the judge does not uphold all parts of the pupil’s case: a claim of harassment is rejected in the decision reported by outlets. Coverage across the articles indicates the dispute is brought against West Lothian Council and centres on accessibility and suitability of toilet provision rather than other issues. While the exact legal basis and remedies are not detailed in the provided excerpts, the decision is presented as a finding of unlawful conduct and indirect discrimination, alongside the dismissal of the harassment allegation. The case therefore proceeds on the basis of the upheld findings, with the rejected element meaning the harassment claim does not succeed.