Apple partly prevails in a European Union trademark dispute over a logo filed by Chinese keyboard and keycap maker Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) had partially refused the company’s European Union Trade Mark application after Apple opposed it. The contested logo shows a citrus fruit design with a green leaf tilted to the left and stylized segments at the bottom that resemble keyboard keys. Apple argued the mark was too similar to its own apple logo, which uses an apple shape with a detached leaf. The EUIPO did not find the two designs conceptually similar in a strict sense, noting that the contested sign is better perceived as a highly stylized round-shaped fruit in general rather than specifically an apple. The office also found only very low visual similarity and acknowledged minor commonalities between the marks, while identifying multiple differences. However, the EUIPO agreed with Apple that the citrus logo could unfairly take advantage of Apple’s strong reputation in the EU, potentially leading consumers to make a mental connection between the signs. As a result, the Chinese firm cannot proceed with the trademark for keyboards and related computer goods, though its application for solar panels can continue. The firm has a limited window to appeal.
Apple partially wins EU trademark dispute over Chinese firm’s citrus-shaped logo
Apple partly prevails in a European Union trademark dispute over a logo filed by Chinese keyboard and keycap maker Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) had parti...
- Apple opposes a European Union trademark application filed by Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics, a Chinese keyboard and keycap maker.
- The EUIPO partially refuses the application on the grounds that the citrus-shaped logo could take unfair advantage of Apple’s reputation in the EU.
- The EUIPO finds the logos are visually similar only to a very low degree and not conceptually similar, but still recognizes a risk of consumer association.
- The dispute involves a stylized citrus/fruit logo featuring a tilted green leaf and bottom segments that resemble keyboard keys.
- The firm is blocked from using the mark for keyboards and related computer goods, but its solar-panel application can proceed; appeal is possible within two months.
The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has partly granted Apple’s opposition to a trademark application from a Chinese company called Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics, due to concerns that its citrus-shaped logo could benefit from Apple’s reputation in the EU. Here are the details. more…
3 months agoApple objected to a European trademark filing from a Chinese keyboard maker because the logo the company wanted to use was too close to Apple's own logo. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) partially refused to grant a European Union Trade Mark after Apple opposed the filing. The company, Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics Co., makes mechanical keyboards and keycaps, according to its website, though it also seems to sell solar panels. The logo the company uses is a citrus fruit with the bottom segments turned into keyboard keys, with a green leaf angled to the left at the top of the fruit and a missing section on the right side. Part of the company's name translates to a citrus fruit, which is likely the reason behind the design. Apple argued that the logo resembled an apple with a detached leaf and a bite, which the EUIPO did not agree with. It found the perfectly round shape of the logo did not track with the shape of an apple, and that it looked more like an orange. The opponent argues that the figurative element of the contested sign also consists of an apple device with a detached leaf and a bite. However, the body of the figurative element consists of a circle (despite the missing part) and apples are not perfectly round. Furthermore, apples are not normally depicted in such a shape which is, in any case, more akin to an orange or other round-shaped fruits. Therefore, while the Opposition Division agrees that the figurative element of the contested sign is likely to be perceived as depicting a fruit of some sort and that the detached oblong shape is therefore also likely to be perceived as depicting a leaf, in view of its round shape together with the relatively generic leaf shape, it will not be immediately associated with any fruit in particular but rather with a round-shaped fruit in general. It follows from the above that, in the present case, the relevant public will perceive the contested application as a highly stylised round-shaped fruit bearing additional fanciful figurative elements. In particular, the triangular shapes, due to their arrangement, may be seen as segments. Furthermore, the square and rectangular figures in the lower part, again by virtue of their arrangement, may evoke a keyboard. The EUIPO did acknowledge that there were some "minor commonalities" between the two designs, but also noted numerous differences. Overall, the two logos were found to be "visually similar, albeit to a very low degree," and the EUIPO concluded that the "signs are not conceptually similar." Even though the EUIPO did not feel that the citrus fruit logo looked like an apple, it largely decided in Apple's favor because of the strength of Apple's reputation in the EU and the potential for customers to "establish a mental 'link' between the signs." Apple claimed the citrus fruit logo would take unfair advantage of Apple's reputation, and the EU agreed. Apple's argument: Given the immense reputation of the Opponent's Earlier Mark, it is hard to believe that the Applicant's intention was not, at the very least, to bring the Opponent's Apple Logo to mind in some way. More likely, the Application represents a deliberate attempt to take advantage of that reputation to offer identical and highly similar goods. As a result, the addressed public, when confronted with the Applicant's sign, will wrongly assume that the Application indicates a connection to Apple (i.e. that the Applicant is a supplier or manufacturer). Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics Co. is not able to continue with the trademark process for keyboards or any other related computer goods, but the application to use the logo for solar panels will proceed. The company is able to file a notice of appeal in the next two months. Apple and Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics Co. also had a trademark dispute in the U.S., but the trademark application was terminated after the Chinese company failed to respond in opposition proceedings. Apple has objected to fruit-related logos several times in the past. It sued the developers behind an app named Prepear because the app used a pear-shaped logo that had a leaf, and it objected to an apple logo used by a Norwegian political party. Apple opposes dozens of trademark applications every year in the U.S. and other countries.Tags: European Union, TrademarkThis article, "Apple Wins EU Challenge Over Keyboard Maker's Citrus Logo" first appeared on MacRumors.comDiscuss this article in our forums
3 months ago
Wordle hints and answers published for multiple dates by CNET and Forbes
Multiple outlets publish daily Wordle support, including hints and the correct solution for specific puzzle numbers and...
Jang Dong-yoon announces October wedding to Kim Seung-yoon in handwritten letter
South Korean actor Jang Dong-yoon announces he will marry actor Kim Seung-yoon in October. In a message posted on social...
Apple asks court to reject OpenAI’s bid to dismiss trade secrets lawsuit
Apple is urging a judge not to dismiss its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI, while OpenAI seeks to end the case. App...