A U.S. federal court dismisses patent claims brought by Natsoft against Hexaware. According to multiple outlets, the court rules that the patents at issue do not present specific, concrete inventions, but instead cover broad, abstract ideas. The dismissal means Natsoft’s asserted claims fail to meet the legal standard required for patent-eligible subject matter, as characterized by the court’s findings. The coverage describes the decision as rejecting the validity or enforceability of Natsoft’s claims based on their breadth and abstraction rather than on a detailed assessment of a particular technical improvement. Hexaware, which is described as a global IT services provider, is named as the defendant in the case. The reporting is consistent across sources, with each stating that the court’s reasoning centers on the patents claiming abstract ideas rather than specific inventive concepts. The materials provided do not include further details such as the case number, the specific patents asserted, or whether either party is likely to appeal.