Multiple reports describe peace talks proceeding slowly, attributing the lack of progress to a cumbersome communications method involving messages sent back and forth through couriers. The outlets say the process causes significant delays, with information taking days to move between parties. As a result, negotiations are described as moving at a slower pace than intended, limiting the ability to respond quickly to developments, clarify positions, or adjust terms in real time. The articles present the issue as a logistical bottleneck rather than a specific dispute over the content of negotiations. They indicate that the courier-based approach is not effectively supporting timely dialogue, which can stretch timelines for reaching agreement. Across the sources, the central theme is that the mechanics of transmitting messages—rather than the broader political context alone—are contributing to difficulties in achieving a faster deal. The reporting aligns on the overall claim that the communications process is inefficient and that it has not enabled the negotiations to progress at a workable speed.