Several outlets say a deal connected to the Strait of Hormuz could allow oil to flow through the waterway again soon. The reporting frames the development as a potential near-term improvement, but emphasizes that consequences of the earlier conflict attributed to Trump’s actions are expected to last longer. Sydney Morning Herald, Brisbane Times, and The Age (Melbourne) all argue that while tanker routes may reopen and oil transport may resume, the overall damage from the war will not disappear immediately. They describe the lingering effects as extending for months, and possibly years, implying continuing economic, market, or regional stability impacts even after shipping conditions improve. The sources present the same central idea: the resumption of oil flow does not erase the longer-term costs associated with the conflict. No additional details about the specific terms of the deal, timelines, or the precise nature of the damage are provided in the shared excerpts.