The Supreme Court suspends lawyer Jesus Falcis III from the practice of law for one year over a 2018 social media post. The case involves comments described as “vulgar” language contained in a Twitter posting made in 2018. The Court issues the penalty as a disciplinary measure, ordering Falcis’s suspension from practicing law for the duration of the one-year period. The suspension is tied specifically to the content of the social media post rather than other conduct or charges reported in the available coverage. The decision reflects the Court’s authority to discipline members of the legal profession for behavior it considers inconsistent with professional responsibility. Both reports characterize the Supreme Court’s action as a one-year suspension grounded on the use of vulgar words in the 2018 online posting. The news items available do not include additional details on the exact wording of the post, the Court’s findings, or whether Falcis contests the ruling.