Multiple outlets report that a Bunnings executive is criticising Victoria’s proposed work-from-home (WFH) laws. The coverage says the company’s boss warns the planned rules could lead to negative outcomes for some employees, framing the issue as a potential workforce impact rather than a purely regulatory debate. While the articles note the executive’s concerns about how the laws may affect staff, they also indicate the claims are tied specifically to Victoria’s “incoming” legislation and its expected effect on employers operating in the state. The reports provide the same basic thrust: Bunnings is publicly taking issue with the proposed WFH direction coming from Victoria and argues there may be “grim” consequences for certain workers. Beyond that, the sources align mainly on the existence of the criticism and the overall warning, rather than presenting detailed evidence or quantified impacts in the brief summaries provided. No alternative view is attributed in these excerpts, and there is no additional detail on timelines, enforcement, or specific provisions of the proposed laws.