Several outlets review Scotland midfielder Scott McTominay’s World Cup performances, with discussion centered on whether expectations of a larger impact are justified. Both sources note that some criticism has emerged that McTominay has been “understated” or has not delivered the influence some fans anticipated. At the same time, they question whether such criticism properly reflects his role within Scotland’s setup. The coverage frames the debate around how a midfielder’s contribution may not always appear in headline statistics, depending on tactical responsibilities, match context, and the balance of play Scotland asks of him. One source focuses on whether the criticism is fair given his underlying involvement, while the other raises similar points and reiterates that perceptions of impact can be shaped by expectation versus actual function on the pitch. Overall, the articles present the same issue—McTominay’s perceived output—while weighing the possibility that his contributions may be less visible but still relevant to Scotland’s performances at the tournament.