South African Speaker Thoko Didiza faces criticism from multiple political parties after she chooses not to oppose President Cyril Ramaphosa’s interdict related to the Impeachment Committee. Several outlets report that the decision has triggered political backlash and renewed debate over parliamentary accountability and the role of the Speaker in court actions affecting parliamentary processes. Critics argue that not challenging the interdict could weaken parliament’s position during the impeachment process, although specific legal reasoning or alternative proposals are not detailed in the reports provided. The dispute centres on whether the Speaker should have moved to oppose the interdict and how such decisions influence the balance between the executive and parliamentary oversight. Supporters and the Speaker’s office are not described in the supplied summaries, and the reports focus mainly on the reactions from political rivals. Overall, the story presents an ongoing controversy in which party representatives call for clearer accountability around parliamentary procedures connected to the impeachment process.