Paul Hogan responds to comments by Pauline Hanson in which she name-checks him as an example of the kind of Australia she says should be returned to. Hanson has been described by multiple outlets as arguing for a “monoculture” and suggesting a revival of earlier Australian figures, including Paul Hogan and Norman Dunstan. In reaction, Hogan publicly criticises Hanson’s framing, describing her vision as looking “living in the past.” Reports also link the exchange to Hanson’s One Nation, noting that the party’s support appears to be dipping. One outlet frames Hogan’s response as addressing what it characterises as racism and monoculture themes in Hanson’s remarks, while other coverage focuses on his rebuttal to her claim that he embodies the Australia she wants to see. Across the articles, the central points are the prior remarks by Hanson about returning to a Paul Hogan–Norman Dunstan era and Hogan’s subsequent public disagreement, delivered in a context of discussion about One Nation’s political standing and appeal.