Multiple outlets argue that the U.S. Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program—designed to offer temporary protection to certain immigrants in response to conditions in their home countries—has operated in practice as an extended or long-term status. The criticism is that TPS is repeatedly renewed while it is rarely, if ever, revoked, which critics say undermines the program’s “temporary” label. Both sources frame the issue as a structural feature of how TPS decisions are carried out over time: extensions continue as eligibility is maintained, but removal or termination of protections has not matched the intent suggested by the program name. The discussion centers on the gap between the stated timeframe implied by “temporary” and the reality that individuals may remain in protected status for long periods. The sources do not cite specific policy details or dates in the provided excerpts, but they converge on the broader contention that TPS effectively functions as durable relief rather than short-term shelter from deportation.