Multiple outlets report that the Coalition is warning that parliamentary inquiries are becoming less effective following a court ruling that is seen as limiting Parliament’s power to compel participation. The reports say tech companies and relevant officials are increasingly not attending or refusing to provide information, undermining the usefulness of inquiry processes. The Coalition’s criticism is directed at NSW Premier Chris Minns, who it accuses of failing to stand up for Parliament’s “power” after he previously took a more assertive public stance. The stories also describe a broader pattern of corporate and ministerial no-shows that, according to the Coalition, risks making inquiries “toothless.” While the outlets focus on the Coalition’s position, they collectively frame the issue as arising from the interaction between parliamentary inquiry powers and the constraints created by the recent court decision. The reporting indicates that the debate centers on how lawmakers can obtain evidence and testimony when legal rulings affect enforcement and attendance requirements.