A royal commission into anti-Semitism hears that Meta does not meet a claimed “gold standard” for removing hate speech. Testimony and submissions presented to the inquiry indicate that a number of offensive statements remain on Meta platforms, suggesting gaps between the company’s enforcement standards and what the commission considers effective removal of harmful content. The coverage reports that the issue is raised in relation to content moderation practices by Meta, including the types of hateful or offensive remarks that are allegedly still allowed to stay online. The commission’s focus is on how platforms handle anti-Semitic material and whether current systems prevent the spread of such content. While both outlets describe the same core claim—Meta’s failure to meet the commission’s standard for hate speech removal—neither source provides detailed metrics or specific examples in the brief account. The reports nonetheless frame the testimony as evidence of shortcomings in Meta’s moderation approach as assessed by the commission.