On July 4, the White House Domestic Policy Council releases a 162-page report that criticizes the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History. Across outlets, the report says the museum has adopted an “ideological framework” and is caught by what it characterizes as a “radical, activist ideology.” It argues that the museum moves away from an approach focused on straightforward historical education and instead treats the American story as a political instrument rather than a shared national inheritance. The report also alleges the museum has not established exhibits devoted to foundational U.S. topics and events, including the nation’s founding and the Revolutionary period, and that the institution cannot be trusted to present history in an “inspiring” or “uniting” way.
Smithsonian leadership disputes the characterization. CBS and other coverage describe a dispute in which Smithsonian head Lonnie Bunch responds that the report misrepresents the museum’s work, emphasizing that Smithsonian exhibits are guided by scholarship, accuracy, and efforts to present the full scope of American history. The White House criticism is also presented alongside commentary about potential bias from both sides. A Smithsonian spokesperson maintains the institution has long practiced nonpartisan, independent scholarship.