Apple and Epic Games continue to litigate their App Store antitrust and related claims as parties argue over whether lower-court deadlines should be paused while the Supreme Court reviews part of the case. Apple asks the judge overseeing the matter in the Northern District of California to pause further proceedings related to App Store commissions during the Supreme Court’s review. Apple argues Epic’s opposition is incorrect and also points to an unrelated securities fraud case that has been paused as support for halting proceedings in the present dispute.
Epic counters Apple’s request, opposing the proposed pause and challenging the arguments Apple makes for stopping commission-related litigation. In parallel, the court addresses scheduling: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agrees to postpone key deadlines, allowing temporary relief while the broader request for a wider pause is considered.
Overall, the case remains active, but with adjusted timelines. The immediate outcome includes postponed deadlines, while the parties dispute the scope and justification for any broader pause during Supreme Court consideration.
