Multiple outlets report that a centre associated with Gary Gatto helped set up research that is used to support a defence of the CFMEU amid scrutiny of the state’s “Big Build” projects. The articles say the research has been cited in arguments that downplay purported costs related to alleged Big Build corruption. They frame the centre’s role as part of efforts to shape how the corruption scandal is discussed, including attempts to reduce the weight of claims about financial impact.
While the reporting focuses on the centre’s involvement in preparing or backing the research, it does not provide a unified technical account of the methodology or specific findings across all outlets. Instead, the common thread is that the research is used politically and publicly in connection with the CFMEU and the broader corruption allegations tied to Big Build.
All sources agree that the centre’s work is linked to research that critics say is aimed at undermining or nullifying aspects of the corruption narrative, particularly around cost impacts.
