Two Dev.to posts describe why AGENTS.md can drift and how to make it “executable” by linking its contents to mechanisms in the repository that verify behavior. They note that the AGENTS.md convention is standard Markdown and that the FAQ frames it as documentation the agent parses, not something that the system automatically validates. As a result, prose can become outdated: agents may follow incorrect instructions without any error, because nothing fails when the claims are untrue.

The posts propose treating AGENTS.md like code. The first argues for a structure where each enforceable claim includes an explicit enforcement line pointing to a specific toolchain and outcome, and where examples in the document are live-tested so the rule truly fires or fails as documented. It describes a workflow that regenerates a rule index from source-of-truth files and uses pre-push hooks and self-audit tests to prevent drift. The second emphasizes practical maintenance steps: copy-paste commands that actually run, point to configuration files rather than restating them, update AGENTS.md in the same PR as code changes, and define a “Definition of Done” tied to passing lint/tests. Together, they present AGENTS.md as a verified interface between repo conventions and agent actions, rather than an unvalidated suggestion.