Free AI tools extract RFP and PQQ requirements using Cloudflare Workers and Groq

I Made a Free AI Tool That Plans Your PQQ Responses

If you've ever bid on a public sector contract, you know the PQQ drill. Someone sends you a Word document with 47 questions spread across 6 sections. Company info. Technical capability. Financial standing. Health & safety. References. Maybe something about modern slavery or carbon reporting because it's 2026 and everything has to check everything. You have to: Read every question Figure out what category it falls under Decide which ones are easy and which will take a week Dig up the right evidence for each one Track word limits And you're doing this at 10pm because the submission deadline is Friday. I got tired of doing this manually, so I built a free tool that does it in one click. What it does PQQCheck takes any PQQ document — pasted raw, formatting and all — and runs it through an LLM that understands procurement documents. It returns: Every question extracted — no more re-reading the document to check you didn't miss one Category tags — Technical, Financial, H&S, Insurance, etc. Difficulty ratings — Easy / Medium / Hard at a glance so you know where to start Suggested evidence — what to prepare for each question Word limits — pulled straight from the document Here's what the output looks like: | Question | Category | Difficulty | Suggested Evidence | Limit | |-----------------------------------|-------------|------------|----------------------------|-------| | Provide your registered name & no | Company | Easy | Certificate of Incorporation | 50 | | Describe IT managed services exp | Technical | Hard | 3 case studies + CVs | 500 | | Provide H&S policy | H&S | Easy | Current policy document | — | | ISO 27001 certification details | Technical | Medium | Certificate + scope doc | 200 | Why this matters for procurement teams Most PQQ response planning is reactive. You read the document, start answering, and discover mid-way that a question needs a certificate you don't have or a reference you can't get in time. PQQCheck flips that. You know before you start writing which questions are straightforward and which will need prep. You can assign work, chase evidence, and avoid the 11th-hour scramble. The tech (it's boring on purpose) Frontend: Single HTML file. No framework, no build step, no npm install. Open it and it works. Backend: Cloudflare Worker calling Groq's llama-3.3-70b-versatile. Fast enough for real-time use. BYOK: If the free tier runs out, paste your own Groq API key. Self-host: Full Docker setup on GitHub. Deploy to your own infra in 5 minutes. The entire tool is one HTML file. Not a React app. Not a Next.js project. One file that does one thing and does it reasonably well. Try it Live: tools.workswithagents.com/pqq Source: github.com/vystartasv/agent-tools YouTube demo: @WorksWithAgents Drop any PQQ in the text area and hit Analyze. It works with real procurement documents — the messy, formatted, bullet-pointed kind. If it struggles, paste your own Groq free tier key and it'll handle longer documents. What's next I'm building a full suite of these — one free tool per procurement pain point. So far: ✅ BidCheck — RFP compliance analysis ✅ PQQCheck — PQQ response planner (this one) ✅ BidMate — Bid/no-bid decisioning ✅ ESGCheck — ESG requirements checker ✅ PlainCheck — Readability score for responses ✅ ScoreCheck — Bid scoring matrix ✅ TimelineCheck — Tender timeline planner ✅ ObligCheck — Contract obligations tracker ✅ PriceCheck — Pricing analysis ✅ RiskCheck — Risk assessment ✅ WinThesis — Win theme builder ✅ GrantCheck — Grant compliance All free. No login required. No account needed. Open source. If you work in bids, proposals, or procurement — give it a try and let me know what's missing.

2 hours ago

I Built an RFP Compliance Checker in One Session — Here's the Exact Stack

The scene: Friday evening. You're on page 147 of a 200-page procurement spec. Clause 17.3 says "mandatory: Cyber Essentials Plus certification." Your draft response says "Cyber Essentials certified." Those two words — "Plus" and nothing — are the difference between a compliant bid and an auto-disqualification. I've been there. So I built a tool that catches it before you hit submit. What it does Two text boxes. One API call. One table. Paste the specification. Paste your draft. Click analyze. The tool returns a compliance matrix showing exactly what's covered, what's partial, and what's missing — categorised by requirement, with suggestions for each gap. No accounts. No database. No data stored. Open the page, use it, close it. The exact stack Inference: Groq, free tier. Running llama-3.3-70b at no cost. ~30 analyses per day included. If you burn through that, there's a BYOK field for your own API key (any OpenAI-compatible provider). Backend: One Cloudflare Worker. 180 lines of JavaScript. Receives text, sends it to Groq, returns structured JSON. Deployment is npx wrangler deploy. Frontend: One HTML file. Vanilla JavaScript. Dark and light themes. Side-by-side text areas on desktop, stacked on mobile. Domain: Cloudflare DNS, proxied CNAME to the Worker. Routes by path so new tools don't need new infrastructure. Ongoing cost per month: $0. The part that surprised me The hardest part wasn't the code. It was the prompt. Getting an LLM to return consistently structured JSON across different procurement formats — PDFs pasted as plain text, multi-column tender tables, scanned sections — took more iterations than the entire deployment pipeline. The trick was three things working together: response_format: { type: "json_object" } on the Groq API A prompt that spells out the exact JSON schema Temperature at 0.1 — you want deterministic here, not creative Live demo https://tools.workswithagents.com/rfp Click "Load Sample" to see it work with a real IT managed services tender. The analysis takes about 15 seconds. For the visual walkthrough: https://youtu.be/kW7U1GNjG-c Why "Tools That Cost Nothing" Every tool in this series will be: Free to use — no pricing tiers, no "request demo" Free to run — the infra costs me nothing Single-purpose — one problem, one fix, one page Openable — you can see how it works, fork it, or ignore it Next in the series: a plain-English grader for procurement responses. Because if the evaluator can't understand your bid, you've already lost.

1 day ago