Kemi Badenoch raises the prospect that the UK could leave the International Court of Justice (ICJ), saying the country should not remain under the court’s jurisdiction if doing so conflicts with the national interest. According to the reports, she links the question of continued ICJ involvement to concerns about potential environmental or climate-related damages claims, describing them as potentially very large in financial terms. The Daily Mail reports that Badenoch frames the issue as one of sovereignty and policy control, arguing that the UK should not be subject to outcomes that could carry significant economic impact. The articles emphasize that her comments focus on whether the UK should continue participation in the ICJ when it believes the legal process could lead to substantial liabilities. The reports do not cite specific rulings or particular cases in the excerpts provided, but they present Badenoch’s remarks as a political signal regarding the UK’s posture toward the ICJ and the risks she associates with environmental damages litigation.