Multiple outlets report that Israel’s consul in New York orders staff to cancel New York Times subscriptions, citing “blood libel” claims. A statement attributed to the consul says the cancellations follow what it describes as a series of false “blood libels” and ongoing incitement against the Jewish state.

The Jerusalem Post adds additional context for the consul’s rationale, asserting the Times has published reporting and commentary that the consul characterizes as fueling accusations of anti-Israel bias. It specifically references an opinion piece published in May alleging Israeli involvement in the mistreatment of Palestinian detainees, which the outlet presents as a basis for the consul’s decision.

Neither outlet provides details on whether the Times disputes the consul’s characterizations, nor do they describe any further steps or official communications beyond the order to cancel subscriptions. Overall, the reports agree the decision is framed as a protest or response to perceived harmful or defamatory coverage, using the “blood libel” term as the stated justification.