India responds at the UN to a statement delivered on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) concerning Jammu and Kashmir, rejecting what it calls the grouping’s “willful blindness” and inability to distinguish between “victim and perpetrator.” Lok Sabha MP Biplab Kumar Deb delivers India’s national statement at the UN General Assembly Sixth Committee, which addresses measures to eliminate international terrorism.

India’s message disputes references to Jammu and Kashmir and defends India’s actions against what it describes as terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Deb frames India’s position around cross-border terrorism and cites an earlier attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam as evidence of continued threats, while also warning of consequences for supporting terrorism. He additionally urges greater focus on Pakistan’s role in parts of Kashmir.

Across outlets, the core divergence is in emphasis rather than substance: coverage highlights either the “victim vs perpetrator” line at the UN or India’s defence of its counterterror measures. All accounts report that the OIC statement refers to alleged strikes involving Pakistan while invoking UN Security Council resolutions, but India says the remarks are inaccurate and unjustified.