The Supreme Court directs authorities to ensure people have free movement and that there are no illegal detentions, with any restrictions described as subject to public order. The court also seeks affidavits explaining whether agencies complied with an earlier Supreme Court order dated October 9.
According to reports, the affidavits must cover steps taken to issue traffic and rail service advisories, as well as any Metro-related curbs. The court wants details on alleged violations of its October 9 directions, including whether any detentions occurred outside lawful limits.
While both outlets focus on the same core directives—free movement, prohibition of illegal detentions, and compliance with the October 9 order—they highlight the practical aspects the court requires from the authorities: documentation of advisory measures and clarification of how Metro restrictions were applied and whether they matched the court’s instructions, within the stated public-order framework.
