A court rejects an application by two parties seeking to keep their identities secret while they challenge a special report from Victoria’s corruption watchdog. Both parties attempt to conceal who they are as they pursue efforts to quash or overturn the watchdog’s report. The court determines it will not grant the request for secrecy, meaning the identities linked to the legal challenge remain disclosed rather than anonymised. The matter centres on whether the report can be stopped or set aside through the court process, but the decision reported in these accounts specifically addresses the secrecy application. With the rejection, the proceedings continue without the parties being granted anonymity, allowing the case to proceed under their identified roles or names. The reports do not describe the underlying allegations in detail, focusing instead on the court’s refusal to allow the challenge to be conducted with hidden identities.