A controversy is reported over a display at the National Portrait Gallery that addresses Sir Winston Churchill’s role during the famine in British India. The outlet coverage says the exhibit includes claims that Churchill deliberately allowed Indians to starve to death, prompting public criticism. The dispute centers on how the period is described and whether the display’s language and interpretation are accurate. Responses described in the reporting focus on “fury” surrounding the exhibit and the allegation of intentional responsibility attributed to Churchill. The reporting is framed as an argument over historical interpretation rather than a dispute over whether the famine occurred. The gallery’s presentation is presented as the trigger for backlash, with critics objecting to the exhibit’s specific assertion of deliberate policy or intent. Other sides in the dispute are not detailed in the provided excerpts, but the overall account indicates that the display has become a focal point for renewed debate over Churchill’s wartime and imperial decisions and how they relate to the causes and culpability surrounding the famine.