Justice Clarence Thomas dissents from the Supreme Court’s Tuesday decision striking down President Donald Trump’s executive order that restricted birthright citizenship. In a lengthy dissent, Thomas argues that the ruling “devalues” American citizenship and questions whether the majority opinion will hold up over time. The decision addresses the scope of citizenship granted to people born in the United States. While the Court moves forward by invalidating the executive order, Thomas’s separate opinion signals his disagreement with the outcome and the reasoning behind it. His dissent emphasizes the constitutional and policy implications of changing or limiting how citizenship by birth is treated. The sources also report that Thomas is the longest-serving justice currently on the bench and frames his critique in terms of the long-term durability of the ruling. Together, the outlets highlight that Thomas is alone in his position within the accounts provided, with his dissent standing out against the Court’s majority action to overturn the executive order.