A lawsuit against United Airlines alleges the carrier sold “window seats” that did not have actual windows. According to reports, passengers paid for seats advertised as including a window, but when they boarded the aircraft, the seats allegedly had a cabin wall rather than a window view. United asked a judge to dismiss the case, arguing against the claim that passengers were misled in the way alleged. The judge has rejected that request, concluding that passengers plausibly paid for an actual window rather than for a seat location on the aircraft. The decision means the lawsuit can continue, at least past the early legal stage. The case could also have broader implications for how airlines describe and market seat features. The dispute centers on the accuracy of the “window seat” representation and whether the airline’s disclosure and practices meet consumer expectations and legal standards. No final liability determination is reported in the sources; the ruling addresses whether the lawsuit should proceed.