Multiple outlets describe President Donald Trump’s so-called “anaconda” tactics as a strategy that applies economic pressure on Iran and China. The articles frame the approach as consistent with a business-oriented view of policy, suggesting that leverage is created through financial and trade-related actions rather than purely military measures. Both sources characterize the tactic as gradually tightening constraints on targeted countries, aiming to limit their options and increase compliance with U.S. interests. While the pieces use similar language and interpretation, they present the concept primarily as analysis or commentary rather than detailing specific new policy actions or verified outcomes. The coverage emphasizes that the pressure is intended to affect economic behavior and calculations, with the underlying premise that economic constraints can drive diplomatic or strategic results. Overall, the sources agree on the central theme: the “anaconda” metaphor is used to describe an economic pressure campaign directed at both Iran and China.