An advocacy group campaigning for more housing construction has released an online atlas that analyses zoning laws across Australia’s capital cities. According to reports, the atlas uses a “zoning scorecard” to compare how housing-friendly each city’s planning rules are, based on factors embedded in local zoning arrangements. Coverage indicates the ranking identifies one capital city as the most housing-friendly among those assessed, while other cities score less highly under the group’s method. The atlas is presented as a tool to make differences between planning frameworks easier to understand, with the aim of informing debate about housing supply and development settings. While the articles note the release of the scoring resource and its headline finding about the top-ranked city, they also frame it as an examination of existing zoning settings rather than a direct measure of current housing delivery. Details such as the criteria used for scoring and the full results across all capitals are discussed as part of the atlas release, which is accessible online.