Researchers have put forward a new theory about how consciousness works, presenting it as a “radical” idea that they say is not dependent on flesh and blood. Across the available reporting, the story frames consciousness as a long-standing, difficult-to-explain phenomenon in nature and notes that scientists are still working to understand what consciousness is and how it arises. The articles describe the researchers’ proposal as questioning conventional assumptions that consciousness must be tied directly to biological processes. However, the provided excerpts do not include specific details of the theory, such as the proposed mechanism, evidence cited, or how it differs from existing scientific models. They also do not describe any experiments, peer review status, or named authors. As presented here, the key points are that the work is theoretical, it proposes a different basis for consciousness than purely biological explanations, and it remains part of ongoing scientific debate.